Please provide us with any comments you would care to make on these or any other issues affecting township government in Pennsylvania.
1. I am opposed to county taking over planning and zoning. I would be in favor of it if local townships and residents had more input than what the current system has. In my personal business I have dealt with many townships across the state. I believe that township government is the ABSOLUTELY the most CORRUPT form of government. There is not enough checks and balances currently in place. Supervisors and secretary's get in office , are uneducated , bias , and create and maintain their own little kingdoms. The few honest public servants ( and there are many honest people out there) that get elected either are voted out after one or two terms or resign in disgust. The state ethics commission should be expanded and have the willingness to investigate wrongdoing. possibly there could be regional ethics commissions with copies of their complaints and reports copied to the state ethics commission. I know of 5 townships in York county that officials should be removed from office for their actions. By the way , I am one of the few honest people that is resigning in disgust.
2. Metal Twp. does not have a tax mileage for our Township and we haven't had one since 1994.
3. I DO NOT THINK THAT TOWNSHIP EMPLOYEES GET ENOUGH CREDIT OF THE JOBS THAT THEY DO. THE COUNTIES COULD NOT HANDLE MANAGING ALL THEIR AREA, NOR COULD THE STATE HANDLE ALL THE COUNTIES, YET PEOPLES OPINION OF TOWNSHIP WORKERS IS NOT VERY HIGH. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THEM GET JUST A LITTLE MORE CREDIT FOR A JOB WELL DONE. MOST PEOPLE WOULD NOT DO THIS JOB IF IT WAS THE ONLY JOB LEFT ON EARTH.
4. We need to have radar as an approved method of speed enforcement.
5. The state government has not increased the liquid fuels money to the townships, and restricts how this money is spent. An example is not certifying ciders from any source and therefore making townships buy them from their general fund.
6. I feel local Government is effective however there are some municipalities who don't act responsibly. Our Township has an excellent record in responsiveness to citizens needs and complaints, concerns, etc. I feel we are outstanding in many areas and we have made great strides in the last 3 years in recreation, road maintenance, land use and development, police & fire protection and many others. One of the problems in Cambria County is junk vehicles and just plain old piles of junk mainly on private property. I would be in favor of a county wide or state wide program that would not allow private property owners to accumulate junk and junked vehicles.
7. Our township needs more money to get the citizens out of the mud. The citizens cannot afford to pay more taxes, therefore, it is going to be years before all the roads are adequately maintain.
8. I think that the local government should have a stronger say in the law and policies of the state government. The Township Officials are on the firing line everyday and not only live but work with the people and know thier needs and wants.
9. Twps need a mix of tax options to pick from. The 2 cent increase in gas tax is the most important item the State Legislature could do for local government. Brookings report-Twp government is not the problem with Pa. Is what is right with Pa. The report listed the problems but did not list the correct solution.
10. Key issues in Solebury are: 1. Traffic, roads 2. Sprawl 3. School taxes and disproportionate State funding
11. Need to find a way to get qualified intelligent people to serve in local government. Most people don't want to be bothered. Some have personal agendas.
12. Since you're asking: -School taxes are out of control. Foreclosures in PA are at a record high because people cannot afford their school taxes. -Intermunicipal agreements are a good idea if executed porperly, however I have never seen one that isn't a cash-cow for the consultants involved. -State Police are spread way, way, way too thin due to the fact that the costs for a municipality to maintain or create a local police department are insanely high. As a result, most rural municiaplities (in my neck of the woods at least) are lawless. My township has been called "The Wild West" for years. -It is political suicide to raise taxes. Period. Even if the amount of services is dropping off as a result of increasing consultant, insurance, and fuel costs. -DEP is an out of control regulatory agency with unchecked power to sink your municipality financially. -Legalized slot machines are only going to benefit the areas that have the licenses. The rural townships are going to see little if any benefit from this plan. -The new UCC construction code is the biggest tax increase ever handed down by our state. The law is confusing at best. It favors suburban municipalities. The only groups that are going to benefit from this unfunded mandate are the consultants that are looking for our business as inspectors. -Good luck if you want to repair any local roads because of the increasing fuel costs, a lot of asphalt plants are closing down, and the few that are remaining open are extremely expensive. You had to ask.
13. I have served on both the planning commission and the board of supervisors for thirty years. Unfortunately we do not have zoning. In the past thirty years our population has more than doubled, Open space is not an issue because we still are rural in nature.
14. The most difficult issue we have is being able to afford police. With the recent legislation passed of Act 30, this complicated our ability to neogitate these issues with the bargaining unit. It also placed additional financial burden on an already increasing expense to keep up with the liability. Our MMO for the police pension has risen dramatically since I have been in office and continues to rise at a rapid rate. In 1995, we were overfunded. Today, our Actuarial consultant has indicated that in 2005, our MMO will be $132,000. In addition, with Act 111, we continue to see the Bargaining unit uncooperative when negotiating because when we go to arbitration we are responsible for our arbitrator AND the third party (impartial)arbitrator. The Association has NO expenses and nothing to loose and actually want to go to arbitration to see what they can get! The third arbitrator should be a shared cost as with grievance arbitration so both parties are eager to negotiate in good faith! In addition, the list of arbitrators should not be a you strike one, I strike one, it should be a list that you get the next arbitrator. Each County should have a list of arbitrators, not someone out of Philadelphia that has no idea of the makeup of your community.
15. Most of the problems that are created are due to lack of education and lack of enforcement. PA passes many laws but does not apply them equally to all areas. Residents want not understanding the financial impact that they will expereince. All government offices must learn how to say no once in a while. Then explain the ramifications of the requests as made. If everyone deserves special treatement then why are the laws created?
16. Local municipalities are doing a great job. Keep control there - don't give it to the County or State.
17. If the state or feds.are going to impose laws on townships they should also pay the price it cost us to do it.
18. Although Open Space preservation is vitally important to our community's future well-being, I would like to express our displeasure with the lack of increase in LIQUID FUEL FUNDS over the past decades. I know of no sectors of state government that have had to make do with funding levels that have had such low/non-existent adjustments for cost of living or inflation than what townships have had to handle with respect to the maintainance of our roads. Please, please, please find a way to increase our Liquid Fuel Allocations so that we can maintain our roads without having to tax our residents further. A larger gasoline tax, which many out-of-state drivers would pay, seems to be a reasonable way to address this shortcoming. Thank you. Jay Sletson, Gregg Township, Centre County
19. Getting qualified Supervisors to run for office is a real concern because of the tiny pay and large problems...thus "nitwit" people run and abuse the system and put the township in debt! It's a JOKE to be a non-employee supervisor. Part time job with a Full time position. The Supervisors are on the FiringLine and the state Reps hide out in Harrisburg controling the money and making it nearly imposible to get local funding for infa structure. We at the Township level are suppose to work as volanteers. excuse my spelling...
20. Less control from Harrisburg for schools and Townships. Allow impact fees for development. Tell Harrisburg to get a spine and taise the Income Tax, not pass the burden to school districts and local municipalities.
21. allow a business tax so they pay for the services they need. example Wal-mart only pays $800 to township services but the twp cost just for that area is to serve Wal-mart is over $5,000 each year. Also allow twp to place the cost where it is created - give us a easy way to impose impact fees on new development
22. Mosst rural townships have plenty of open space because of state owned land. rural areas need money to improve aging infrastructure, upgrade equipment and create a positive land area for industrial growth and tourism where warranted.
23. We do not have a real estate tax and haven't since 1974. We collect the earned income tax, plus realty transfer and occupation. We don't have zoning (yet) or a local police force. The combination of a growing community and low operational costs allows for no real estate tax. Having said that, I feel federal and state government mandates that require the local level to assume new and complicated responsibilities are wrong and costly. Local govt used to be people friendly, but no more thanks to state and federal levels imposing their agendas and then requiring the local government to enact and pay for it (UCC, Sewage, Traffic Signals, Environmental Regulations, Emergency Management, Flood Plains, Land Use Planning, etc). If they want new policies or regulations, then adopt and enforce them at the state level and hire the people to get the job done. According to Brookings, that should be the most cost effective way of handling any problem because operating everthing at the state level is the ultimate "regionalization" plan......Just some thoughts/rants.
24. Two key things Harrisburg must give local government to improve its operations: 1. Tax reform that allow muncipalities to choose from a wide range of taxing options; and 2. Completely rewrite the Municipalities Planning Code to transform it into enabling legislation for local government not the building industry.
25. Transportation improvements take unreasonably long time to construct (buget concerns & excessive red tape regulations). Sewer improvements need more governmental subsidies due to excessive costs to meet enviromental regulations & standards
26. The Brokkings
27. Property taxes account for a relatively small part of a township's budget therefore the issue of voter referendums before increasing the property tax is not as important as the issue of expanding the EIT as a revenue source for townships. This is the most fair tax for supporting township programs and should be structured to allow for replacing the property tax.
28. The UCC as it now stands from SB1139 is an improvement over the original bill, but when are you going to allow individual to be more responsible for their own affairs. This is an invasive bill that will add a great deal of cost and unnecessary other additions to building. Borrowing to cover anticipated gambling revenues is also putting our children and grandchildren in debt. Don't spend the money until you have it. This is how I run my township and it has served us very well.
29. Change the law that allows the township to pay in full or co-pay health insurance for the elected officials and their famlies
30. We had our first millage increase this year since 1992.