Lowman S. Henry
|
Wanted for Stealing Democracy:
The New Jersey Supreme Court
By Lowman S. Henry
Deborah T. Poritz
James H. Coleman, Jr.
Peter G. Verniero
Virginia Long
Jaynee LaVecchia
James R. Zassali
Barry T. Albin
They're America's newest black robed bandits, members
of New Jersey's Supreme Court who recently drove the get-away car as
the Democrat Party stole the rule of law from the good citizens of the
Garden State.
For months, actually for years, U.S. Senator Robert
G. Torricelli, Democrat of New Jersey, nicknamed "the torch"
has been going down in flames. An individual completely devoid of an
ethical compass, Torricelli was consumed by greed, and the inability
to separate his personal best interests from the best interests of the
people he was elected to serve.
Democrat party leaders, both nationally and in New
Jersey, stood by their man until late September when it became obvious
that his continued candidacy would cause them to lose his pivotal seat
to a nearly unknown Republican, Douglas Forrester. With control of the
U.S. Senate likely to be decided by one vote or less, the Democrats
took what should have been a losing gamble.
Although a New Jersey law, passed by a majority of
both houses of the New Jersey legislature and duly signed into law by
the state's governor, clearly prohibited replacing a candidate on the
ballot less than 51 days before a general election, Democrats sought
to violate that law and substitute another candidate for the tarnished
Torricelli.
Acting as though they actually had a right to select
another candidate, Democrat leaders drafted former U.S. Senator Frank
R. Lautenberg as their ninth inning replacement candidate. They were
undeterred by the fact their actions ran counter to the prevailing law
of their state.
Enter the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Seven justices who swore to uphold the law.
They didn't.
The justices have disgraced themselves in the eyes
of their countrymen as surely as the members of the Florida Supreme
Court did in a more high-profile election controversy nearly two years
ago. That time, though, there was a compelling national interest for
the U.S. Supreme Court to enter the fray and save democracy. Absent
that compelling interest, the nation's high court opted to pass on the
New Jersey case.
And so it stands.
The New Jersey Supreme Court instead of upholding the law, rewrote the
law. It seems in New Jersey the legislature and the governor have been
rendered meaningless and the state is now being governed by judicial
fiat. When the law stands in the way of what the prevailing political
powers want to see happen, it is simply overturned and ignored.
All of this is good news for the state of Florida. They are no longer
the nation's reigning political joke. Just like the newly crowned Miss
America, the tiara of atrocious jurisprudence has been passed.
I think limerickist Al Bienstock said it best with this little ditty:
Jersey's Supreme Court, as expected,
Said the legislature's rejected
Rule of law, not of men?
Not when they wield the pen.
That court needs to be disinfected.
Amen.
(Lowman S. Henry is Chairman &
CEO of the Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research, Inc.
His Keystone Commentaries are aired statewide on Lincoln Radio Journal.)