Lowman S. Henry Robert W. Keibler Jane R. Gordon Board Members Jerry Bowyer James Canova LeGree S. Daniels Joseph Geiger Hilary Holste Charles L. Huston, III Doris O'Donnell Albert Paschall James Trammell __________ Survey Consultant Focus Group Moderator |
September 29, 1998 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Lowman S. Henry / (717) 671-0776 BLURRED VISION: Central Pennsylvanians Don't See Eye-To-Eye with Harrisburg, PA -- Central Pennsylvania's effort at
regional government, known officially as Envision Capital Region, got mixed reviews from
voters in Cumberland, Dauphin and York Counties in the Lincoln Institute's recent Pulse
Poll. |
Responses to those questions were at least partially driven by
the fact voters feel local government operates the most efficiently. Forty-four percent
said local governments were most efficient, 21% credited state government for efficiency,
9% said county government was the most efficient, and 5% said the federal government
operated the most efficiently. Another 10% said no level of government operated
efficiently.
When it comes to school districts, voters say they like the
status quo, but smaller is better than bigger. Forty-nine percent said school districts in
Central Pennsylvania are "about the right size," 26% said school districts are
too big and should be broken up into smaller districts, and 11% favored Envision's call
for centralized, countywide school districts.
Satisfaction with the size of school districts ran the highest in
York County where 55% of the voters surveyed said they like the status quo, in Cumberland
County 50% thought their school districts were the right size. However, in Dauphin County
only 39% of voters felt school districts are appropriately sized, while 36% think
districts are too large and should be broken up into smaller districts.
The survey found solid agreement on the issue of academic
standards, a concept supported by Envision Capital Region. Ninety-two percent said
public schools should adopt a clear set of academic standards which must be met for
students to advance from grade to grade.
Envision Capital Region's goals for improving Central
Pennsylvania's transportation system received a vote of support from those surveyed by the
Lincoln Institute. Sixty-nine percent support the development of a high speed rail line to
link Harrisburg with Pittsburgh and Philadelphia. Only 15% disagreed with that goal.
The development of a commuter rail line linking Harrisburg with
Carlisle, Lancaster and York also received solid support. Seventy-nine percent say such a
rail system should be built, while 11% disagreed. Dauphin Countians were particularly
supportive as 83% want such a commuter rail line. Seventy-nine percent of Cumberland
Countians and 76% of York Countians agreed.
The Pulse Poll found Harrisburg International Airport (HIA) is
the point of departure of choice for most mid-staters travelling by air. Fifty-four
percent said they use HIA, while 28% cited BWI (Baltimore-Washington International
Airport) as the facility they most often use. Only 1% said they most frequently depart
from the Philadelphia International Airport. Seventy-one percent of those surveyed in
Dauphin County and 60% of those flying from Cumberland County say they use HIA, while York
Countians choose BWI over HIA by a 44%-38% margin.
There is consumer support for increasing the number of flights
departing from HIA. Sixty-three percent of tri-county voters said more flights should be
scheduled, versus only 9% who felt that enough flights originated from HIA.
Central Pennsylvanians also believe last Spring's hike in
gasoline taxes and vehicle registration fees was justified. Fifty-two percent felt the
additional revenue was needed, 38% thought the state already had enough money to meet
transportation needs.
Central Pennsylvania voters would like to have a more direct say
in governmental affairs. Eighty percent say they should be given the right to vote by
referendum on key public policy decisions made by their local or county government, or by
school districts. Dauphin County voters in particular support referendum rights as 85%
want the right to vote in referendums. Eighty-four percent of those surveyed in Cumberland
County and 75% in York County also said they would like more opportunity to vote in
referendums.
A good place to start might be the issue of spending tax dollars
to finance the construction of new sports stadiums. Seventy-nine percent say a statewide
referendum should be held to allow voters to decide whether or not tax dollars can be
spent on new stadium construction. In Dauphin County, which is the only one of the three
counties that currently has a taxpayer financed sports stadium, 88% say referendums should
be held. As York County considers constructing a minor league baseball stadium, 77% of
voters there feel they should be able to express their opinion by referendum.
Mid-staters may want such a referendum because they strongly
feel sports stadiums should be paid for with private dollars, not financed by public (tax)
money. Ninety percent say private investors should pay to build sports stadiums, only 5%
say it is proper to use tax dollars. Ninety-three percent of Dauphin Countians, and 89% of
Cumberland and York countians voiced opposition to using tax dollars to construct sports
stadiums.
Proposals to sell off the state liquor stores and to use a
portion of the proceeds to pay for the construction of sports stadiums lacks support in
the tri-county area. Sixty-eight percent said the state stores should not be sold to raise
funds to build sports stadiums, while 24% said they should be sold and part of the money
be used for such purposes.
The Lincoln Institute's Pulse Poll was conducted by Precision
Marking, Inc. of Easton, Pennsylvania on September 13 and 14, 1998. A total of 311
registered voters in Cumberland, Dauphin and York Counties participated in the survey
which has a margin of error of +/- 4%.
The Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research, Inc. is a
Harrisburg-based non-profit educational foundation which conducts public opinion research
on key local, state and national public policy issues.