|
EDITION 64 |
|
Penn State: whatever we want
by
Al Paschall
I’ve known State Representative John Lawless
since his first election 11 years ago. From
his western Montgomery County district he isn’t afraid of anything.
As a totally unexpected victor over a golden boy incumbent Lawless has
never really been sure if he has power or is trying to get power, but he has the
ultimate politician’s intuition when it comes to grabbing a headline.
Lawless ran as a Democrat
but turned Republican a few days after he was elected when House speaker Matt
Ryan promised him a few extras. Undoubtedly
something Ryan regrets as Lawless has turned a few extras in staff and equipment
into the platform he wants, that anybody wants who has to run for re-election
every two years wants: something more secure.
That’s probably a seat in the Pennsylvania Senate.
I know this from our
relationship. It is consensual. We keep the correct distance with a mutual respect and speak
of each other in politically correct terms that are hopefully not offensive to
any gender, national origin or belief. Over
the years there have been many examples of our politically correct definitions
of each other.
At one time or another I may
have compared Mr. Lawless with the symbol of the Democratic Party, a donkey, as
the word is used in the Old Testament.
In turn, I have heard that Mr.
Lawless has suggested on one occasion that my writing is the by-product of the
effluent of a male bovine.
To that end it was necessary for
me to reply that should Mr. Lawless be confronted with his derriere and an
excavation of the earth in front of him, he might not know the difference.
Undoubtedly many readers agree
with Mr. Lawless’ suggestion that my rump and brains are two combined parts of
my body.
So you see there aren’t many
things that unite John Lawless and I. Its
seems that words that describe the least attractive parts of our anatomies have
been our mutual venerable ally in our war of opinions.
Besides our engagement in public policy the portions of our bodies that
are shared with the classic description of a donkey are in fact mixed up with
our brains. And that is our only
true common denominator.
And in this politically correct
way in America in ‘01, we have a good idea of what we think of each other. It’s too bad we never attended Penn State together.
We could’ve have gone to a women’s festival last November, sanctioned
by the University, that according to the Associated Press: “had a name that
included a vulgarity to the female anatomy.”
A vulgarity so repugnant that if uttered by anyone in the workplace, of
either gender, it’s likely to have resulted in an investigation by the
Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission. But
in that forum where politically correct didn’t exist, Lawless and I could have
called each other whatever we wanted to.
The Pennsylvania Human Relations
Commission defines three primary forms of sexual harassment.
One of these is visual harassment and abuse.
The definition includes “X-ray vision” leering, obscene gestures or
displays and decorations of sexually explicit pictures, objects, materials or
crude cartoons in work areas. You
can get fired and you and your employer can be fined for violating this
definition. But at Penn State the
policies of the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission aren’t considered even
with $362 million taxpayer dollars in the till. Of course it’s not misogyny that’s condoned, at Penn
State its merely sexual awareness that’s being tolerated.
With 81,000 students in the Penn
State University system learning this brand of tolerance, politically correct
language will undoubtedly wane in Pennsylvania.
The students are being taught that sexual faire and abhorrent language
are the norm. Continually exposed
to this philosophy when they get in the workplace Penn State grads are likely to
be far more tolerant of sexually aggressive expression.
And in that climate someday
State Representative John Lawless and I will be free to call each other whatever
we want, whenever we want, wherever we want, however we want.
So will you. The big losers
will be women, minorities and any member of any group that has ever been
targeted by derogatory or hurtful stereotypes.
But until that day comes, on the matter of sexually explicit public expression
at Penn State, as a parent and a taxpayer, I’ll call John Lawless right.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albert
Paschall is senior commentator for the Lincoln Institute, a non-profit
educational foundation in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Ó
Calvin-Graham Enterprises 2001. www.lincolninstitute.org
![]() |
"Some days" © Calvin-Graham Enterprises, distributed at no charge to selected newspapers in the the Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania by the Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research, Inc., 453 Springlake Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112. Receipt of distribution is permission to publish as bylined op-ed only. Not available as letter to the editor. The Lincoln Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation dedicated to promoting the ideals of free market economics and individual liberty through the conduct of public opinion research. The opinions expressed in "Some Days" do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institute its officers or directors. |