|
EDITION 66 |
|
It's a bad joke
by
Al Paschall
What’s the difference between a dead skunk, a
dead lawyer and a dead doctor in the middle of a Pennsylvania highway?
I’m not sure I understand the motive for lawyer
jokes. Why is the profession of
defending truth, justice and the American way the butt of so many bad puns?
Maybe it’s in the way lawyers were created.
Legend holds that right after the Garden of Eden came crashing down Satan
complained to God that he was getting all the blame for human failure.
“God,” Satan said, “these creatures you made wreak havoc.
They fight, get arrested and cheat each other and I get all the blame!
It’s not fair and you’ve got to do something!”
So to be fair to the Devil, God created lawyers.
You never hear the same jokes about doctors.
In Pennsylvania doctors make about what lawyers make and we go to doctors
when we have troubles just like we do with lawyers.
Today just like lawyers physicians work on a contingency fee.
HMO’s will pay them every month when we’re alive and stop the checks
when we die. If we’re really in
bad shape our local doctor will give us an HMO referral to a big time doctor and
then the HMO will pick up the whole tab. After
all they want to keep us alive so that the HMO money keeps coming.
Same thing with lawyers working on contingency fees.
If the lawyer keeps your malpractice suit alive and scores big dollars
for you in a jury trial its time to cash in on a big fee.
Without a contingency fee when we’re in bad shape from some doctor’s
mistake we couldn’t afford a big time lawyer to make everything all right.
The difference is that trial lawyers don’t enjoy
nearly the success rate that doctors do. If
doctors worked as well as lawyers did half of us would probably be dead.
Last year trial lawyers in the state only won about 45% of the cases that
they got into court but when they won, they won big.
Pennsylvania ranks sixth among states with the percentage of malpractice
awards in excess of $1 million. As
for the other half of the cases the trial lawyers probably didn’t lose.
Its likely that most of them were settled out of court with the
aggravated party, and their lawyer, collecting from the doctors’ insurance
companies.
Somebody’s got to pay, so it’s the doctors for now.
The first of this year the premiums that doctors pay in Pennsylvania for
malpractice insurance increased anywhere from 21% to 60%.
In the southeast, home of the infamous Philadelphia lawyer, some rates
increased by a painful 75%. Driven
by the failure of the state’s general assembly to enact reasonable laws that
protect us from incompetence while protecting us from trial lawyers, physicians
are retiring or leaving the state in record numbers.
Targeted specialties: obstetricians, pediatricians and neurologists, are
likely to be the first to go.
The technical term for a reasonable medical malpractice
law is called tort reform. Tort
reform means that we can still sue truly negligent doctors for our damages and
collect for legitimate pain and suffering.
But we need a common sense standard that requires expert witnesses to
really practice medicine not just drop in from some 800 number dial a witness
pool. Effective change demands that
we treat each case individually with full disclosure of any money that’s been
paid to the injured party by any other insurance companies involved in the
case.
Historically the power of the Pennsylvania Trial
Lawyers Political Action Committee has turned any efforts in the state to cure
what ails the malpractice system into a bad joke.
This time though it’s not just a pain in the business community’s
pocket book. Untreated the medical
malpractice crisis threatens all of us. If
Harrisburg doesn’t act someday soon those already at high risk of deficient
medical care, poor people in rural and urban areas, will be the first to feel
the pain and then the cost will get passed on to all of us.
You’ll
have to decide for yourself about the skunk and the lawyer, though one probably
has skid marks in front. The doctor
never got hit. He moved out of
Pennsylvania before the accident happened.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albert
Paschall is senior commentator for the Lincoln Institute, a non-profit
educational foundation in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Ó
Calvin-Graham Enterprises 2001. www.lincolninstitute.org
![]() |
"Some days" © Calvin-Graham Enterprises, distributed at no charge to selected newspapers in the the Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania by the Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research, Inc., 453 Springlake Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112. Receipt of distribution is permission to publish as bylined op-ed only. Not available as letter to the editor. The Lincoln Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation dedicated to promoting the ideals of free market economics and individual liberty through the conduct of public opinion research. The opinions expressed in "Some Days" do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institute its officers or directors. |