|
EDITION 68 |
|
Pennsylvania’s
lottery luck could change
by
Al Paschall
I bet I have some of the best bookies in the
state. Each Saturday at the
supermarket I hand over $5 to one of them and get my Super 6 lottery number. But some days it’s tough.
While I let the machine pick my numbers I almost invariably end up in
line behind people who have written out the numbers they charted from their
horoscopes or culled from license plates in the parking lot.
Meanwhile the poor lady behind the counter has to answer the phone and
respond to shouted questions from people passing by about how fresh the bananas
are, all the time trying to poke sets of numbers into an antiquated computer
system. While I’ve been tempted
from time to time to play the numbers with my kids’ birthdays it would drive
my bookies nuts and just embarrass me. After
all I’ve never won more than 20 bucks from the state lottery.
Of course the state’s bookies like me because I lose.
The ticket to real money when you run big time gambling is more losers
than winners. Gambling doesn’t
come much bigger than Pennsylvania’s lottery.
In fiscal ‘99 the lottery took in just over $1.7 billion and it’s
been a jackpot for Pennsylvania’s senior citizens.
State law mandates that the lottery pay out 40 cents on the dollar for
programs. The lottery funds PACE
one of the most politically protected state entitlements that pays for a portion
of prescriptions for some of the state’s indigent senior citizens.
But the state lottery has a lot of competition.
29 years ago when the General Assembly legalized gambling some naïve
legislators thought that when the government became the biggest gambling
enterprise in the state that every bookie between Philadelphia and Erie would
fold. It didn’t work out that
way. Bookies by nature have to be
clever. Early on they realized that
the state had conveniently modernized their system.
No more posted numbers in the back rooms of barbershops or taprooms.
Using private sector know-how bookies began to pay twice what the state
did on the daily number with far better odds and the state serviced their
enterprising ways by broadcasting the daily number on TV and radio every day.
Through some more dumb luck Pennsylvania never got in
on the multi-state lottery. 22
states own a gambling pool that runs games like Rolldown and Power Ball.
These high rollers open up with $10 million prize pots.
80,000,000 to 1 odds against winning doesn’t slow down eager
Pennsylvanians when jackpots climb to $100 million.
They form pools at work when somebody offers to take a sick day to cruise
into West Virginia or Delaware to try to get everybody in on the big action.
In all of this for the first time in nearly three
decades Pennsylvania’s big bookie may let us down.
The state’s lottery managers predict that revenue will be off at least
$1 million this year and unless something is done to jump start sales, funding
for the senior programs may be cut.
Lottery officials think that the Buckeye State may be
Pennsylvania’s answer. The hope
is that combining big lottery games like Super 6 and Cash 5 with Ohio’s
Buckeye 5 or Kicker lotto might boost the prize pool enough to get some people
to up their ante or others to get into the game for the first time.
Ohio’s gambling managers want to move the mark because their sales have
shrunk by about 10% since their all time high of $2.3 billion in 1996.
Ohio’s lottery losses risk dipping into taxpayer pockets fast. Our western neighbors use their gaming profits for public
education. Funding that by its
political nature is virtually fixed.
But there’s not a lot of science that says where the
break-even point will come. While
more people might take a chance when prizes regularly top $25 million, it also
means that bigger prizes for more winners will push Pennsylvania back into the
loser’s circle.
The Pennsylvania Lottery’s luck could change for the better if it just picks
up some of Ohio’s systems. More
ticket outlets with just 180 days to claim prizes instead of a year and award
bigger cash prizes on the small ticket games.
Someday the state might even bring in the touchscreen technology that
Ohio is using to let players pick the numbers by themselves.
Then my bookies can go back to running their supermarket and I can play
my license numbers or kids’ birthdays privately without being embarrassed and
ticket sales will jump. Then the
Pennsylvania Lottery Commission can cast its own fortune and won’t have to
gamble that the state of Ohio will pay off.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albert
Paschall is senior commentator for the Lincoln Institute, a non-profit
educational foundation in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Ó
Calvin-Graham Enterprises 2001. www.lincolninstitute.org
![]() |
"Some days" © Calvin-Graham Enterprises, distributed at no charge to selected newspapers in the the Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania by the Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research, Inc., 453 Springlake Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112. Receipt of distribution is permission to publish as bylined op-ed only. Not available as letter to the editor. The Lincoln Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan educational foundation dedicated to promoting the ideals of free market economics and individual liberty through the conduct of public opinion research. The opinions expressed in "Some Days" do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institute its officers or directors. |