Lincoln * Institute

Dr. Paul Kengor

Dr. Paul Kengor

Executive Director
Center for Vision & Values
at Grove City College


Please click to donate to the Lincoln Institute.

Lincoln Institute
of Public Opinion Research, Inc.

5405 Jonestown Road, Suite #110
Harrisburg, PA 17112

Phone: (717) 671-0776
Fax: (717) 671-1176

Kengor's Corner

Death of a Bad Dude

by Paul Kengor

In the 1980s, I was an unrefined adolescent from blue-collar Butler,

Pennsylvania. I knew nothing and cared nothing about politics. I had no idea if

I was a conservative or liberal, Democrat or Republican, or much of anything

else. But I knew one thing: Moammar Kaddafi was a bad dude. This was expressed

in a rather unsophisticated way by the bumper-sticker affixed to my white Chevy

Chevette, which declared simply and succinctly: "Kaddafi Sucks."

Yep, Moammar Kaddafi was a bad dude. And now, three decades later, and some

40-plus years after coming to power, he is gone, dispatched to the ash-heap of

history with other murderous terrorists and dictators: Osama Bin Laden, Saddam

Hussein, Pol Pot, Mao Tse-Tung, Joe Stalin, Vladimir Lenin.

I will not here add to reports of how Kaddafi met his final fate, but I would

like to share a valuable piece of information that was revealed to me by Bill

Clark, Ronald Reagan's right-hand man and national security adviser when

Kaddafi was ramping up in the 1980s.

It was early 1981. President Reagan had just been inaugurated. Alexandre de

Marenches, the director of France's external intelligence agency, SDECE, came

to the White House with a highly sensitive plan to remove Kaddafi. The plan was

to assassinate the Libyan dictator during a parade, by use of an explosive

device placed near the reviewing stand. "Our answer," said Clark, "was that we

understood their feelings toward the man, but we don't do assassinations."

That was because there was an executive order banning assassinations, first

signed by President Gerald Ford and supported by President Carter. The Reagan

team had no intention of violating the order as one of the first acts of the

new administration.

Intelligence sources I consulted confirmed Clark's recollection of de

Marenches' request. "He came over to the U.S., probably in early February

1981," said one source, a high-level CIA "operations" person. "His interlocutor

was Vice President Bush. The purpose of the visit was to discuss the removal of

Kaddafi. He came to try to get us involved operationally in the plan…. He

wanted not just our moral or political support but to get us involved in the

actual operation."

This same source pointed to the "Safari Club," which was a group of

countries–France, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, and the Shah's Iran–that had

banded together for two primary purposes: 1) to fight the spread of Soviet

communism in Africa; and 2) to counter Kaddafi, particularly his adventures in

neighboring Chad. The group was formed by intelligence ministers in the

mid-1970s, and de Marenches was its catalyst. The group was appalled by

America's unwillingness to no longer stand up to the Soviets; it was

post-Watergate, post-Vietnam, Americans had elected an incredibly liberal

Congress, and Jimmy Carter was president. The Club sought to fill the vacuum.

De Marenches' offer against Kaddafi was consistent with the concerns of the

Safari Club.

As an indication of the confidential nature of his overture, de Marenches did

not discuss his offer to the Reagan administration in either of his 1986 and

1992 books. But he did note yet another intention to kill Kaddafi: He said that

on March 1, 1978, Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat had asked de Marenches for help

in "disposing of him [Kaddafi] physically."

Think of the irony here, and how tragically history unfolds: It would be Sadat

who was assassinated in 1981–on October 6, 1981. He was killed at a reviewing

stand at a parade, shot by Islamists for his "crime" of making peace with


While Sadat died, Kaddafi was permitted to live. Sadat made peace. Kaddafi left

a trail of blood and violence.

And here's another irony still: Just weeks after de Marenches' offer to Reagan

to assassinate Kaddafi, Reagan was shot, on March 30, 1981, and nearly bled to


In retrospect, should President Reagan have agreed to the French request to

take out Kaddafi? A lot of innocent lives would have been spared. Terrorist

attacks from Lockerbie, Scotland to the Mediterranean would have been averted.

Alas, such action by Reagan would indeed have been illegal, and was not the

mission or foreign-policy plan of his incoming administration. Had Reagan

started his presidency by violating an executive order on assassinations,

liberals in that post-Watergate/post-Vietnam Congress would have run him out of

town with impeachment papers before his historic two-term takedown of the Evil

Empire could commence.

Reagan did what he could–or couldn't.

Nonetheless, this is a very intriguing tale of what happens behind the

scenes–and what might have been. The death of Kaddafi had to wait–it had to

wait a long, painful 30 years. Only now, finally, this bad dude is gone.

– Dr. Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College and

executive director of [2]The Center for Vision Values. His books include

[3]"The Judge: William P. Clark, Ronald Reagan's Top Hand" and his latest

release, [4]"Dupes: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for

a Century."

[5] | [6]








This message was sent by: Grove City College, 100 Campus Drive, Grove City, PA 16127

Manage Your Subscription: